Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö¼ú¿¡¼­ ¸ðÀÇ Á¶Á¾µÈ 3Â÷¿ø Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ»óÀÇ ÀÀ¿ë

Application of Simulated Three Dimensional CT Image in Orthognathic Surgery

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1998³â 28±Ç 2È£ p.363 ~ 385
±èÇüµ·, À¯¼±±¹, ÀÌ°æ»ó, ¹Úâ¼­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇüµ· (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
À¯¼±±¹ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÇ¿ë°øÇÐ
ÀÌ°æ»ó (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÇ¿ë°øÇÐ
¹Úâ¼­ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â ¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö¼ú ÀüÈÄÀÇ ÈÄÀü¹æ ¹× Ãø¹æ µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¿¡¼­ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö
¼úÀüÀÇ 3Â÷¿ø Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþ»ó¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸ðÀÇ Á¶Á¾µÈ 3Â÷¿ø »óÀ» ¾ò´Â »õ·Î¿î ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé
¾î º¸¾Ò°í ÀÌ ¹æ¹ýÀ» °ËÁõÇÏ°íÀÚ ¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö¼úÀ» °¡»óÇÏ¿© ÇϾǰñÀÇ À§Ä¡¸¦ º¯È­½ÃŲ °ÇÁ¶
µÎ°³°ñÀÇ 4°¡Áö °æ¿ì¿Í ¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö¼úÀ» ¹ÞÀº 4¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© º¸¾Æ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú
¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1.ÇϾǰñÀÇ À§Ä¡¸¦ ´Þ¸®ÇÏ°í ½ÃÇàµÈ °ÇÁ¶ µÎ°³°ñÀÇ 4°¡Áö °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ÇϾǰñÀÇ À§Ä¡ º¯È­
Àü ÈÄÀÇ ÈÄÀü¹æ ¹× Ãø¹æ µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¿¡¼­ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÇϾǰñÀÇ À§Ä¡ º¯È­ ÀüÀÇ 3Â÷¿ø
»ó¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ·Î ¸ðÀÇ Á¶Á¾µÈ 3Â÷¿ø»ó°ú ÇϾǰñÀÇ À§Ä¡ º¯È­ ÈÄ¿¡ ½ÇÁ¦ ÃÔ¿µµÈ 3Â÷
¿ø »ó °£ÀÇ ÁÂÇ¥°ªÀÇ º¯À§ ¹üÀ§´Â -1.8 §®¿¡¼­ 1.8 §® ±îÁö ¿´°í ¸ðµç º¯À§°ªÀÇ 94%°¡ 1.4
§®¿¡¼­ 1.4 §®±îÁö¿´À¸¸ç ¶ÇÇÑ µÎ »ó°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÂ÷´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p>0.05).
2. ¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö¼úÀ» ¹ÞÀº 4 ¸í¿¡¼­ ¼ö¼ú ÀüÈÄÀÇ ÈÄ Àü¹æ ¹× Ãø¹æ µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¿¡¼­
ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ¼ö¼ú ÀüÀÇ 3Â÷¿ø »ó¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ·Î ¸ðÀÇ Á¶Á¾µÈ 3Â÷¿ø »ó°ú ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ¿¡ ½Ç
Á¦ ÃÔ¿µµÈ 3Â÷¿ø »ó °£ÀÇ ÁÂÇ¥°ªÀÇ º¯À§ ¹üÀ§´Â - 6.7 §®¿¡¼­ 7.7 §®±îÁö¿´°í ¸ðµç º¯À§°ª
ÀÇ 90%°¡ -4.0 §®¿¡¼­ 4.0 §®±îÁö¿´À¸¸ç ¶ÇÇÑ µÎ »ó °£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÂ÷´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p>0.05).
°á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¼ö¼ú ÀüÀÇ 3Â÷¿ø Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþ»çÁø°ú ¼ö¼ú ÀüÈÄÀÇ ÈÄÀü¹æ ¹× Ãø¹æ µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý
¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ·Î ¸ðÀÇ Á¶Á¾µÈ 3Â÷¿ø »óÀ» ¾ò¾î °ÇÁ¶ µÎ°³°ñ°ú ¾Ç±³Á¤ ¼ö¼ú
ȯÀÚ¿¡ °¢°¢ Àû¿ëÇÑ °á°ú ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ¿¡ 3Â÷¿ø Àü»êÈ­ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀ» ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°íµµ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ
ÀÇ 3Â÷¿ø »óÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °¡´É¼ºÀÌ Á¦½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
In orthodontics and orthognathic surgery, cephalogram has been routine Practice in
diagnosis and treatment evaluation of craniofacial deformity. But its inherent distortion
of actual length and angles during projecting three dimensional object to two
dimensional plane might cause errors in quantitative analysis of shape and size.
Therefore, it is desirable that three dimensional object is diagnosed and evaluated three
dimensionally and three dimensional CT image is best for three dimensional analysis.
Development of clinic necessitates evaluation of result of treatment and comparison
before and after surgery. It is desirable that patient that was diagnosed and planned by
three dimensional computed tomography before surgery is evaluated by three
dimensional computed topography after surgery, too. But Because there is no
standardized normal values in three dimension now and three dimensional Computed
Tamography needs expensive equipments and because of its expenses and amount of
exposure to radiation, limitations still remain to be solved
in its application to routine practice. If postoperative three dimensional image is
constricted by pre and postoperative lateral and postero-anterior cephalograms and
preoperative three dimensional computed tomogram, pre and postoperative image will be
compared and evaluated three dimensionally without three dimensional computed
nomography after surgery and that will contribute to standardize normal values in three
dimension.
This study introduced new method that compute~simulated three dimensional image
was constructed by preoperative three dimensional computed tomogram and pre and
postoperative lateral and postero-anterior cephalograms, and for validation of new
method, in four cases of dry skull that position of mandible was displaced and four
patients of orthognathic surgery, computer simulated three dimensional image and actual
postoperative three dimensional image were compared. The results were as follows.
1. In flour cases of dry skull that position of mandible was displaced, range of
displacement between computer-simulated three dimensional images and actual
postoperative three dimensional images in co-ordinates values was from -1.8 §® to 1,8
mm and 94% in displacement of all co-ordinates values was from -1.0 §® to 1.0 §® and
no significant difference between computer-simulated three dimensional images and
actual postoperative three dimensional images was noticed(p>0.05).
2. In four cases of orthognathic surgery patients, range of displacement between
computer-simulated three dimensional images and actual postoperative three dimensional
images in co-ordinates values was from -6.7 §® to 7.7 §® and 90% in displacement of
all co-ordinates values was from -4.0 to 4.0 §® and no significant difference between
computer-simulated three dimensional images and actual postoperative three dimensional
images was noticed(p>0.05).
Conclusively, computer-simulated three dimensional image was constricted by
preoperative three dimensional computed tomogram and pre and postoperative lateral and
postero-anterior cephalograms. Therefore, potentiality that can construct postoperative
three dimensional image without three dimensional computed tomography after surgery
was presented.

Å°¿öµå

orthognathic sugery; simulation; three dimensional computed tomography;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸